> http://davispj.com/2010/09/26/new-couchdb-externals-api.html WAW. is it in couchdb1.2? this has to be *better* advertised.. somehow.
svilen On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:09:50 +0400 Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > CGI and others may be replaced with CouchDB externals registered as > httpd_global_handler (or proxy + os_daemon as was showed in Davis > article). Probably, that's the simplest way to implement this idea > using only CouchDB and your favourite language. But the idea is the > same. > > More info about externals: > http://davispj.com/2010/09/26/new-couchdb-externals-api.html > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Benedikt Rudolph <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I would like to know if it is possible to set up a CouchDB > >> database such that: > >> - Anonymous users can write to the database AND > >> - Anonymous users can NOT read from the database > > > > I would implement this with a simple server-side handler (node.js > > or servlet or CGI or whatever) that accepts anonymous JSON > > documents and posts them to the database. The database itself > > wouldn’t be exposed to anonymous access at all — either its port > > isn’t publicly reachable, or it’s locked down and the CGI sends a > > valid credential to do its posts. > > > > —Jens
