On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Simon Metson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think expanding to cover other client libraries over time would be good, > e.g. jquery, nano, angular are all js code but different implementations, for > different purposes. The aim for the first pass was to be minimal, though, > hence not using a library unless really necessary.
Thanks for clarification! This looks more promising and valuable for users and developers (: -- ,,,^..^,,,
