Robert Newson <rnewson@...> writes: > > If you didn't > have filters at all, but still had n^2 replications, you've still got > a scaling problem, it's just not directly related to the filtering > overhead. > > B.
Ignoring filtering, is there any idea roughly how many persistent replications can be running before it starts to hurt performance. I know this is a vague question, highly dependent on the system resources of the machine hosting the database, the number of updates being made, etc. I'm just trying to get a rough idea if possible. Are we talking like on the order of 100 replications, 1000s, etc? Thanks, Bill
