On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yves, > > Did you see Adam's reply to your original copy of this request on our > erlang@ mailing list? It's best not to cross-post for this reason. > > B > > > On 14 July 2013 00:08, Yves S. Garret <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 13, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Yves S. Garret < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > The sentence is just above Figure 2 (which is roughly 2/3 of the way > >> > down the page). What I don't understand is why would concurrency > >> > be impacted when latency is reduced? Wouldn't latency reduce as > >> > more processes are created to do more processing? > >> > >> Well, it only says concurrency is “affected”, it doesn’t say in which > >> direction. > >> > >> To be honest, I don’t understand those graphs or the accompanying > >> sentences at all. I can’t tell which axes are dependent on which, or > even > >> whether they’re supposed to be two- or three-dimensional. > >> > >> —Jens > > > > > > *shrug* > > > > The comment about bandwidth was the only thing that I came up with. > Hi, yes I do. This was my mistake, I meant to post this to the couchdb mailing list and accidentally sent it to the erlang one.
