Oh wow...that is pretty snazzy....this is a bit of a dumb question but can everything in a design doc be written in Erlang?..like list functions..shows..etc? On Aug 14, 2013 10:05 AM, "Robert Newson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Erlang is faster and more feature rich. One thing you can do in an > erlang view that you can't do in javascript is > file:delete(AnyPathYourServerCanAccess), which is why we disable it by > default. :) > > Building a view is inherently serial regardless of the language > evaluating each update. > > B. > > > On 14 August 2013 18:02, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Erlang server bypassed stdio interface communication and addtional > > JSON decode/encode roundtrip, so it is faster than JS at some point. > > Also, having Erlang with SMP feature enabled may also improve his > > performance if you have multicore server. > > > > How much? No numbers I have, just an experience background. You can > > measure it with you functions and data and share with us (: > > > > -- > > ,,,^..^,,, > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing > >> views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the > >> JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete. > >> > >> So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much > faster?... > >> Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature complete > as > >> the JavaScript equivalent? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Stanley >
