Yups, also true. In any case, we'll also be moving towards using Erlang-based design docs now. Javascript is great for starters, but once you hit several dozen design docs and a few hundred thousand documents, you definitely need something faster.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]>wrote: > True... But the only way for that to happen is for them to bypass several > other layers of security... In which case I'd have much bigger problems to > worry about > On Aug 14, 2013 8:08 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > So far it seems very promising. :) However, what they say can happen is > > that since Erlang code has no sandbox, anything could be done to the > system > > through design views, if your database is compromised. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Stanley Iriele <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > 5-6 times eh?...that would give me an honest reason for picking up > Erlang > > > again....I'm going to try converting all of my views to Erlang and see > > what > > > happens..what's the worst that can happen? :-) > > > On Aug 14, 2013 7:55 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I had a 5-6 times speed boost yesterday, after converting one of my > > > design > > > > docs to Erlang. Like a breath of fresh air, if you ask me. > > > > > > > > Andrey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Stanley Iriele < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing > > > > > views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the > > > > > JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete. > > > > > > > > > > So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much > > > faster?... > > > > > Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature > > complete > > > as > > > > > the JavaScript equivalent? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Stanley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
