Ahh...phone typo... What he said kinda made me doubt my knowledge... But I'm glad that what I thought is right On Oct 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Jens Alfke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb" > > (Is “to,es” a mathematical term or just a typo for “times”? ;-) > > I think this comparison is apples vs. oranges, as R-tree is a data > structure while CouchDB is a program. There is a geospatial index extension > for CouchDB (https://github.com/couchbase/geocouch/) which likely uses > R-trees internally; if you need to do lots of fast range searches (in one > or more dimensions) it would be a good idea to try it out. > > —Jens
