On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm >> just saying OSQA can't be compared with StackOverflow in term of >> functionalities. StackOverflow is a complex software system with versioning >> management, moderation based on votes, synonyms, it uses extensively >> ElasticSearch, it provides a way to query its data. >> OSQA is just a simple clone with basic functionalities that doesn't >> scale, made for personal use or minor communities. Different things for >> different jobs. But if you don't trust, like or simply you don't want use >> an external service like StackOverflow, OSQA can be an option. Just >> remember that the project is not active anymore, and there is a cost >> related its administration. > > > > This also what they are sayiing on their website. I am not which scale we > really need but the admin cost is really smth w should take in > consideration. > s/am not/don't know sorry forgot to remove the auto correction. and about the scale: http://meta.osqa.net/questions/8645/how-will-osqa-scale-and-perform-under-very-heavy-usage
