The question is meaningless, let me explain. startkey_docid (and endkey_docid) are used for selecting ranges where the view key is the same, it is *not* a separate index. Views are in key order only.
under the covers, the true view key is actually [emitted_key_order, doc._id], the rows are unique in the b+tree. B. On 5 December 2013 23:14, Nathan Vander Wilt <nate-li...@calftrail.com> wrote: > Let's say for every doc I `emit([doc.user])` and, when a user requests a > document ID I have my middleware `GET > …/docs_by_user?startkey=[req.user.name]&endkey=[req.user.name,{}]&include_docs=true&limit=1&startkey_docid=req.param.id`. > I return the row's doc or 404 if the range is empty. Basically I'm giving > each user read access to "their own" objects without having to give them > their own database. > > I'm wondering though, if `startkey_docid` is as scalable as `startkey` > itself. IIRC, the doc ids are simply a final extra group level internally > (clearly they determine sort order) but if this behaves more like > `&skip=lots` instead, then of course relying heavily on the query above would > be something of an anti-pattern. > > (Bonuses: If this _is_ still a reasonable solution, I'm assuming I can't > simplify my emit/query to use `&key=name&startkey_docid=id` right? > Alternatively, would it be more efficient but just-as-correct to emit plain > string keys and limit my range to `&startkey=name&endkey=name+"\0"?) > > thanks, > -natevw