On Jan 2, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is relevant, the OP could use multiple databases to expose the subset of > documents to the appropriate subset of users. True. But FWIW, we found in 2012 that this setup is a hassle to configure (i.e. provisioning user accounts on demand) and won’t scale to large numbers of users (or subsets of users, if you partition that way.) > Mentioning Couchbase is not relevant. :) The Sync Gateway is replication-compatible with CouchDB. I think it’s as relevant to mention here as, say, PouchDB. —Jens
