Depends if we've missed the boat on getting it in to 1.6, which is due very soon. The original decision was not to include the patch, but no-one knew that it fixed any significant problems then. I'll raise it on the dev list.
Nick On 25 January 2014 01:21, Scott Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome Dave/Nick. > > We are using the binaries, when can we expect that they will be available? > > Although I can build from the source if I need to. But I would need to > install GIT, and all other dependencies that are needed. > > -Scott > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul Davis <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: Rian R. Maloney <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 6:41 PM > Subject: Re: Replication of attachment is extremely slow.. LOGGED > INFORMATION > > Yeah. I happened to be staring at that function thinking "This looks > really slow..." and remembered the recent PR. Turns out Nick had > already done all the work fixing it. For reference I'm seeing a > roughly 20x speedup on the HTTP based attachment replication. > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Adam Kocoloski > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well how about that. Go Nick! > > > > Adam > > > >> On Jan 24, 2014, at 7:31 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Interesting note, this is fixed by applying the patch to COUCHDB-1953. > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Rian R. Maloney < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> Will do Dave. Thanks again for the help > >>> > >>> Im away from desk at the moment but - Ive recreated this on 2 windows > 7 pcs and a MAC OS X mini. > >>> > >>> Im putting together a cleansed file - this format is used for check > image exchange between banks so I need to remove personal data. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Rian > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 4:51 PM, Paul Davis < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Duplicated locally. Poking around at debugging what's going on. > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Scott Weber < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Thanks. I'll remember that for next time. > >>>> > >>>> Hopefully, there won't be a next time for a while :-) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: Jens Alfke <[email protected]> > >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Scott Weber > <[email protected]> > >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 2:07 PM > >>>> Subject: Re: Replication of attachment is extremely slow.. LOGGED > INFORMATION > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Scott Weber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I do not see the log attached. It must have been stripped by the > list server. > >>>>> I will copy/paste it to the bottom of this email. It is 1024 lines. > >>>> > >>>> Speaking of netiquette :) please don't paste a thousand lines of logs > into a message. It messes up the threaded view of the conversation. > >>>> > >>>> The listserv running this group is really MIME-unfriendly (ironic, > considering this thread) so attachments are out; but nowadays we have lots > of nice online tools like Pastebin and Gist for hosting big blobs of text > that you can then post a URL to. > >>>> > >>>> —Jens > >
