The only possible advantage of couchdb views is query performance. You would have to measure it.
The time to access a couch view is not much different than a single disk access. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Boaz Citrin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > We have been using for a while both Couchdb views, and C-L indexing. > Seems like the latter gives us anything we need, as long as we don't need > any map/reduce functionality, plus the size is much smaller and no > compaction overhead. > > The question is if there are other reasons to favor the native Couchdb > views. > > Thanks, > > Boaz >
