>>> Couchdb is an ap system... And stores the result of both docs during a
>>> conflict. We have update functions as a way to do incremental updates.
>>> And show functions to do a transform on a doc before sending it. Can we
>>> have union functions to resolve a conflict between 2 docs?...I
Err... Shouldn't we need the common ancestor document too?
Let's suppose that a document {"name": "Bond", code: "007"}
is updated in parallel as {"name": "Bond"} (for security reasons)
and as {"name": "James Bond", code: "007"} (for civility reasons).
We need the ancestor document to know that his "code" was deleted and that
"James Bond" is the right name.
Regards,
Aurélien
