http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Et_selskab_af_danske_kunstnere_i_Rom.jpg is this offensive?
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Bryan Green <[email protected]> wrote: > I would assume we would discuss it as we are now. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Giovanni P <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If I declare myself offended (for no reason, because there is absolutely >> no >> reason to be offended by the present logo) by the next logo you come up >> with, will you change it? >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Bryan Green <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > It may not offend you, but apparently it offends some people. This >> is a >> > > bad thing for a logo. I think this is why it is rare for the human >> > figure >> > > to be common in most logos. Most keep logos very simple. >> > >> > There are 7 billion people on Earth - you'll never fit them all. >> > Let's move away from abstract angry offended people to concrete ones >> > with their own arguments why they thought that logo hits them and >> > discuss their problem personally. Anyone around? Joan? >> > Otherwise this is counterproductive discussion about edge cases which >> > will never happens. >> > >> > -- >> > ,,,^..^,,, >> > >> > >
