Remove old fauxton clone is src: rm -rf src/fauxton - rebar cannot
basically switch dependency origin on fly, only just a branch. That's
why it cannot checkout 2601-2390-config-backdoor as it doesn't exists
in apache repository.
--
,,,^..^,,,


On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Antoine Duchâteau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right,
>
> I used
>
>     {fauxton,           {url,
> "https://github.com/robertkowalski/couchdb-fauxton.git"},          {branch,
> "2601-2390-config-backdoor"},    [raw]},
>
> but I get:
>
> Updating fauxton from
> {git,"https://github.com/robertkowalski/couchdb-fauxton.git";,
>                            {branch,"2601-2390-config-backdoor"}}
> error: pathspec '2601-2390-config-backdoor' did not match any file(s) known
> to git.
> ERROR: sh(git checkout -q 2601-2390-config-backdoor)
> failed with return code 1 and the following output:
>
> Though when I do a
>
> git clone https://github.com/robertkowalski/couchdb-fauxton.git and git
> checkout -q 2601-2390-config-backdoor, the branch exists.
>
> Any idea ?
> A.
>
> Alexander Shorin
> 4 mai 2015 17:33
>
>
> Just replace "fauxton" with {url,
> "https://github.com/robertcowalski/couchdb-faxuton"}
> See
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/rebar.config.script#L56-L67
> for explanation of how dependency definitions are being handled.
>
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
> Alexander Shorin
> 4 mai 2015 16:09
>
> Here is an awesome link to simplify your searches for opened pull
> requests: http://s.apache.org/couchdb-ubersicht
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
> Alexander Shorin
> 4 mai 2015 16:06
>
> Hi Antoine!
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Antoine Duchâteau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I am currently testing CouchDB 2.0 and I am wondering if I do things right.
>
> Thanks for joining our big couch testing party (:
>
> I used the master branch from the git to compile CouchDB from sources but I
> think I read somewhere that fixes for CouchDB 2.0 where being committed to a
> Cassim ? branch.
>
> You might be references to 2657-fix-cassim-fabric-calls branch, right?
>
> Should I use this branch instead of master for testing ? Where can it be
> found ?
>
> If you want to test feature branch for some specific subprobject, just
> edit rebar.config.script in order to point subproject to that branch
> instead of master one. Then run again `./configure` to let rebar fetch
> and update source tree and `make` to compile the changed source files.
>
> But specifically to those cassim branch, afaik the work isn't yet done
> on it. Instead, you may check opened pull requests on GitHub for some
> subprojects and tests these as they are proposed for merge.
>
> CouchDB crashed complaining about ulimit -n being to low. What is a sensible
> value for ulimit -n ?
>
> It depends, but if you don't care about, set some big one like 65536 or
> nolimit.
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
> Antoine Duchâteau
> 4 mai 2015 15:55
> Hi list,
>
> I am currently testing CouchDB 2.0 and I am wondering if I do things right.
>
> I used the master branch from the git to compile CouchDB from sources but I
> think I read somewhere that fixes for CouchDB 2.0 where being committed to a
> Cassim ? branch.
>
> Should I use this branch instead of master for testing ? Where can it be
> found ?
>
> CouchDB crashed complaining about ulimit -n being to low. What is a sensible
> value for ulimit -n ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Antoine

Reply via email to