@Dale and @Ying, I'm sorry if my text sounds aggressive, that was really not what I meant. English is just my second language so I really don't even have an idea of how bad "pretending to develop" sounds at the given context. I was just trying to help.
Please ignore my message above. 2015-10-01 15:55 GMT-03:00 Dale Harvey <[email protected]>: > Ying > > CouchDB 2.0 has long been in development and is nearing a beta release, I > wouldnt be switching existing services to it, but for new product > development, particularly one that needs mango then I would probably > recommend doing so. Mango is already supported in CouchDB 2.0, pouchdb-find > will transparently switch to using it if you are speaking to CouchDB 2.0 > > And Joel, this isnt really a suitable mailing list for questioning peoples > 'product differentials' particularly in that aggressive way "pretending to > develop" > > Cheers > Dale > > > On 1 October 2015 at 17:32, Joel Wallis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You are actually describing Cloudant as the service you are pretending to > > develop. Do you have any planned diferential for this? (Just asking, as > > product manager, to help you plan your product.) > > > > And, PouchDB can be used as an interface for a completely remote CouchDB > > database. Is that what you mean with "couch & pouch transparent"? If not, > > what are the key diferentials for your implementation? (Just asking, as a > > software developer, to help you plan your implementation.) > > > > 2015-10-01 10:34 GMT-03:00 Ying Bian <[email protected]>: > > > > > Dear couchdb developers and users, > > > > > > I’m new to couchdb & pouchdb and I’m looking forward to some comments > to > > > the following problem: > > > > > > I want to setup a couchdb service in the cloud and provide an SDK to my > > > users for them to use in their apps. They can also use pouchdb as a > local > > > replication of their data. An important part of the SDK is the query > > > interface. I want it to be developer-friendly as much as possible. The > > > map/reduce API is too complex for developers with no similar > experience. > > > After some investigation, I think maybe [pouchdb-find]( > > > https://github.com/nolanlawson/pouchdb-find < > > > https://github.com/nolanlawson/pouchdb-find>) is worth to try. Its > > > mongodb like query language is more intuitive in my mind. > > > > > > My questions are: > > > > > > 1. Pouchdb-find is still in beta and its documents says "This API is > > > modeled after the Cloudant query API < > > > https://docs.cloudant.com/api/cloudant-query.html>, soon to be merged > > > into CouchDB 2.0.” Is the support already merged into couchdb 2.0? > > What’s > > > the delivery plan for couchdb 2.0? Is it to safe to switch to 2.0 now? > > > > > > 2. I want the query interface to be “couch & pouch” transparent: the > same > > > query API would be used for both local pouchdb and remote couchdb. I > > > suppose this is not a problem. Am I right? > > > > > > Any comments would be much appreciated. > > > > > > -Ying > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Joel Wallis Jucá > > joelwallis.com > > > -- Joel Wallis Jucá joelwallis.com
