I've used couchdb in production for 3 years now. It's the most reliable part of our architecture. Cloud ant is good for proof of concept but I wouldn't use for production. It's easy enough to spin up your own stack on AWS and have all the resources for your own app plus have better control over security.
I just recently upgraded to 1.6. Not sure why I would need 2.0. > On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Sinan Gabel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Etay, > > You probably want to look at: https://cloudant.com/ > > Also possibly want to follow the blog on activitities: > https://blog.couchdb.org/ > > At the "Issue tracker" you can see that there is quite some activity: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CouchDB/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel > > I will let others comment on the specific plans on 2.0. > > Hope that sheds some light :) > > > Br, > Sinan > >> On 6 June 2016 at 23:46, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> I'm a product manager in a corporate organization in Israel. >> We are building an architecture to our new software project and one of the >> big issues like always is to decide which db is the most suitable for us. >> CouchDB seems like a good choice especially due to its master-master >> capabilities and its filtered replication. >> Our project is one of the most important and central project in our >> organization. >> My biggest concerns about choosing couchdb are: >> 1. Lack of support in cases of crises - payment is not an issue. >> 2. Not enough customers using CouchDB. >> 2. It seems like CouchDB is not growing is the last 2 years. A year ago a >> developer preview version has been released for CouchDB 2.0 and there is >> not enough activity since. >> >> Hope you can help me with my concerns. >> Thanks... >> >> Sent from my iPad
