Brilliant. We always appreciate feedback on Mango so please let us know how it goes.
Cheers Garren On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dan Ballance <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Garren, > > Thanks ever so much for your response. That makes a lot of sense. 100K > results is still a pretty usable limit and means we can take advantage of > mango query's flexibility in the majority of scenarios we'll encounter. > > thanks again, > > Dan > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:09 PM Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Mango Query is using Map Reduce underneath. At this stage its best to use > > mango query where you will get small data sets returned. > > Depending on your application using skip should be fine up to around 100 > > 000 docs or do. So if you are paginating for a user it should work fine. > > But its best to test for your use case. > > > > Cheers > > Garren > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Dan Ballance <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Is there anybody here that can talk about the performance > characteristics > > > of Mango query? In particular I'm thinking about pagination over large > > data > > > sets. The mango query _find API doesn't seem to have startkey, only > > > skip. I'm not clear if that means the performance of skip is fine with > a > > > mango query - or whether mango query should only be used for small data > > > sets? > > > > > > Is anyone able to offer some guidance here please? For the time being I > > am > > > using skip, but I'm not sure if this is a good idea. > > > > > > FYI I have also asked this question on Stack Overflow: > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41587884/is-startkey- > > > pagination-required-for-mango-queries-in-couchdb-2-0 > > > > > > sincerely, > > > > > > Dan Ballance. > > > > > >
