Hi Garren.

Thank you.

I resolve conflicts by PUT ing an updated doc using the latest rev no.
which in any case is the 'Server-Selected Rev:'.
All is/seems to be fine.

In Fauxton, however, when I click 'delete other conflicts' or 'select as
winner' nothing happens. A warning is given re deleting documents but no
revisions are deleted and the other alternatives in the dropdown are not
activated at all.
The couchdb.log shows no change in the situation either as far as I can see.

I am running v 2.0.0 on a single node on Windows 10.


I am using the following to PUT my new document:

curl -X PUT 'http://usr:[email protected]:5984/db/id' -d @1234.json -H
"Content-Type: application/json"


Understandably I presume, I tried and failed to DELETE the conflicts using:

curl -X DELETE 'http://usr:[email protected]:5984/db/id?_rev=other-rev'

resulting in {"error":"conflict","reason":"Document update conflict."}

I presume one cannot just delete conflicts.


Should I be using different port numbers? (v2.0.0)



Everything seems to be behaving normally and all the commands I use are the
same as those I have used in v1.6.1.



Maybe my Fauxton is slightly out of date. Can it be updated separately??



Thanks for your time.


On 23 February 2017 at 12:10, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> If you want the server selected winner then select delete other conflicts.
> If you want the other revision to win, then select it in the dropdown and
> click select as winner.
>
> Cheers
> Garren
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John Le Brasseur <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> > I was resolving a conflict and happened to notice that Fauxton had a
> > '(1)Conflicts' tab showing.
> > Its very nice.
> > It shows the server selected winner and the alternative.
> > One can check the complete documents as well.
> > Very useful.
> > However, I wanted to make the 'other' revision my choice as the winner
> but
> > there seemed no way to highlight the current 'loser' and make it the
> > winner.
> > Is there a way of doing this?
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>


John

Reply via email to