Okay thanks for the swift response. So up until now I have been building
from GitHub. Here's my salt config:
CouchDB source code from github:
git.latest:
- name: https://github.com/apache/couchdb.git
- target: /usr/local/src/couchdb
- rev: 2.0.x
- user: git-user
- require:
- file: CouchDB source directory
- user: Git user present
- failhard: True
- onlyif: test -d /usr/local/src/couchdb
I was doing this to try and ensure we pick up the latest bug fixes in the
2.0.x branch. This is slightly awkward because this was building fine and
I've passed this across to our ops team now and it's no longer building. Is
there any way I can get this to build via git and not have to download a
tarball? I'm just hoping not to have to rewrite my Salt state. I'm assuming
the plan would be for 2.0.x to be able to build from the source on GitHub?
Dan
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:11 PM Dan Ballance <[email protected]>
wrote:
> To give a little more detail:
>
> ==> couchdb (get-deps)
> WARN: Expected /usr/local/src/couchdb/src/docs to be a
> raw dependency directory, but no directory found.
> WARN: Expected /usr/local/src/couchdb/src/fauxton to be
> a raw dependency directory, but no directory found.
> Pulling docs from {git,"
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-documentation.git";,
>
> "a135f2fe89f7b228b793aa2a8a62f0f34b576d8f"}
> Cloning into 'docs'...
> fatal: repository '
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-documentation.git/' not
> found
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-documentation.git
> Gives 404 - No such project
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:05 PM Dan Ballance <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there some kind of server issues guys? My Salt deployment is breaking
> currently:
>
> git clone
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-documentation.git
> Cloning into 'couchdb-documentation'...
> fatal: repository '
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-documentation.git/' not
> found
>
> Has something moved or changed maybe? I'm sure this was building okay for
> me a couple of weeks ago.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
