Hi Guys, Wondering if this is fixable in a future release of the parquet jars? Thanks! From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Trouble with Avro records Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:29:23 +0000
Thanks Josh, it does seem to work if I treat the records as generics instead of a specific class. From: [email protected] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:49:59 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected]; [email protected] +tom Ack, okay. Dug into this a bit more, and I think the source of the issue is in Parquet: the code that is looking for the specific class type inside of Parquet's AvroRecordMaterializer is calling SpecificData.get() instead of the (new SpecificData(classLoader)) impl that we use inside of AvroMode. Not sure that we have a way of getting around this w/o copying and rewriting a lot of the Parquet code, so I added Tom explicitly to see if he has any ideas. J On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Didn't seem to work. I tried output.inputConf("crunch.avro.mode", "SPECIFIC"); output.outputConf("crunch.avro.mode", "SPECIFIC"); as well to no avail. From: [email protected] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:52:35 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected] Hey Danny, So I suspect the problem is that the AvroMode info isn't getting propagated to the ParquetFileSourceTarget. The simplest way to verify the problem is not as simple as it should be, but I'd like you to try something like this: SourceTarget<Log> output = new AvroParquetFileSourceTarget<Log>(new Path(path), Avros.specifics(Log.class)); output.conf("crunch.avro.mode", "SPECIFIC"); ...and let me know if that fixes the problem. If so, I can file a JIRA to fix it properly. J On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> wrote: Hey Danny, I'll take a look at it later today, kind of a crazy AM for me. J On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Okay looks like the AvroMode.setSpecificClassLoader() fix works for Avro files but doesn't work for Parquet Avro files. // This works greatPipeline p1 = new MRPipeline(MyLogs.class, getConf()); PCollections logs = ....;SourceTarget<Log> output = At.avroFile(path, Avros.specifics(Log.class))p1.write(logs, output, WriteMode.OVERWRITE);p1.done(); Pipeline p2 = new MRPipeline(MyLogs.class, getConf());AvroMode.setSpecificClassLoader(Log.class.getClassLoader());PCollection<Log> logs2 = p2.read(out);p2.done(); //This fails with java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.avro.generic.GenericData$Record cannot be cast to com.test.LogPipeline p1 = new MRPipeline(MyLogs.class, getConf()); PCollections logs = ....;SourceTarget<Log> output = At.avroFile(path, Avros.specifics(Log.class))SourceTarget<Log> output = new AvroParquetFileSourceTarget<Log>(new Path(path), Avros.specifics(Log.class)); p1.write(logs, output, WriteMode.OVERWRITE);p1.done(); Pipeline p2 = new MRPipeline(MyLogs.class, getConf());AvroMode.setSpecificClassLoader(Log.class.getClassLoader()); PCollection<Log> logs2 = p2.read(out);p2.done(); Any idea? Thanks! From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:54:56 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected] On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks Josh, if it is any consolation Crunch has saved me countless hours and cpu cycles over how we used to do things so I'm glad to be benefiting from your ill-advised decisions :-) That is always nice to hear-- thanks! Danny From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:33:40 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected] On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Awesome adding: AvroMode.setSpecificClassLoader(Visit.class.getClassLoader()); Did the trick, thanks Josh! Do you mind clarifying when to use Avros.records() versus Avros.specifics() or Avros.reflects()? Oops, yes-- sorry about that. The records() method is defined on both the WritableTypeFamily and the AvroTypeFamily as a method that is supposed to handle "arbitrary" data types that aren't supported by the built-in POJO and Crunch Tuple methods. Fortunately/unfortunately, the arbitrary data types depends on the backing implementation: for Writables, records() only really supports classes that implement Writable, and for Avros, records() checks to see if the class implements SpecificRecord (at which point it handles it using Avros.specifics) and if it does not, passes it on to Avros.reflects. I think that, like many thinks in Crunch, records() reflects an early and somewhat ill-advised decision I made when I was first creating the API that I would likely do away with if I had it to do over again. :) J Thanks Again! From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:20:20 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected] Okay. I suspect this is the problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-442 Gabriel fixed this for the upcoming 0.11 release, but there are a couple of workarounds in the comments. One is to put the avro jar into your job jar file, instead of relying on the one that is in the hadoop lib. The other is to configure AvroMode.setSpecificClassLoader w/the class loader for your Visit class before kicking off the job. Josh On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Josh, crunch-0.10.0-hadoop2 Thanks. From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:04:29 -0700 Subject: Re: Trouble with Avro records To: [email protected] That feels like an AvroMode-related exception; which version of Crunch are you using? J On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Danny Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Guys, Love crunch but having some trouble recently using Avro records. I think someone needs to write a Crunch book. I'm trying to aggregate hourly visits to a page by each user. I do one pass to parse the records and then I try to "group by" unique users and hour and count the number of times they visited as well as their first visit time in the hour. Here's the Avro schema {"namespace": "com.test", "type": "record", "name": "Visit", "fields": [ {"name": "dateid", "type": "int"}, // Year Month Day Hour in PST as an integer e.g. 2014081103 {"name": "userid", "type": "string"}, {"name": "vcount", "type": ["long", "null"]}, {"name": "firsttimestamp", "type": ["long", "null"]} // Unixtime stamp of first visit ] } Here I do the parsing, at first vcount and firstvisit aren't set. PTable<Visit, Pair<Long, Long>> visits = parsed.parallelDo("visits-parsing", new VisitsExtractor(), Avros.tableOf(Avros.specifics(Visit.class), Avros.pairs(Avros.longs(), Avros.longs()))); The relevant line from VisitsExtractor: emitter.emit(Pair.of(visit, Pair.of(1L, log.timestamp()))); Everything up to this point works fine, now I want to count up the unique visitors and the minimum timestamp. PTable<Visit, Pair<Long, Long>> agg = visits.groupByKey().combineValues(Aggregators.pairAggregator(Aggregators.SUM_LONGS(), Aggregators.MIN_LONGS())); The above seems to work fine too, now I want to create new Visit classes and fill in the count and minimum timestamp fields. PCollection<Visit> count_visits = agg.parallelDo("visits-count", new DoFn<Pair<Visit, Pair<Long, Long>>, Visit>() { @Override public void process(Pair<Visit, Pair<Long, Long>> p, Emitter<Visit> emitter) { Visit v = Visit.newBuilder(p.first()).build(); v.setVcount(p.second().first()); v.setFirsttimestamp(p.second().second()); emitter.emit(v); } }, Avros.specifics(Visit.class)); } count_visits.write(To.textFile(outputPath), WriteMode.OVERWRITE); Here's the error: 2014-08-21 15:09:26,245 ERROR run.CrunchReducer (CrunchReducer.java:reduce(54)) - Reducer exception java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.avro.generic.GenericData$Record cannot be cast to com.test.Visit at com.test.Logs$1.process(Logs.java:49) at com.test.Logs$1.process(Logs.java:1) at org.apache.crunch.impl.mr.run.RTNode.process(RTNode.java:98) at org.apache.crunch.impl.mr.emit.IntermediateEmitter.emit(IntermediateEmitter.java:56) So I'm pretty sure the problem is this line: Visit v = Visit.newBuilder(p.first()).build(); specifically p.first() should be a Visit type but I guess it isn't. I assume the output of the groupBy operation in the reducers is serializing the key but not using the correct Avro type to do it? Also I don't think I understand when I should be using Avros.records() versus Avros.specifics() when I have a generated avro file. Thanks! Danny -- Director of Data ScienceCloudera Twitter: @josh_wills -- Director of Data ScienceClouderaTwitter: @josh_wills -- Director of Data ScienceClouderaTwitter: @josh_wills
