That annotator will set the IdentifiedAnnotation.*uncertainty()* with one of the following values:
*HISTORY_STATUS* = 1; *FAMILY_HISTORY_STATUS* = 2; *PROBABLE_STATUS* = 3; On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:32 PM, digital paula <cybersat...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Hi Pei, > > Thanks for the prompt response. Okay, I uncommented out StatusAnnotator > in the AggregatePlaintextPipeline config/descriptor and tried again with > this text. > > "history of diabetes. hx diabetes. prior diabetes. " > > Uncertainty and HistoryOf features remained 0.....doesn't look like > anything happened. Note that I'm validating using the CVD debugger > tool. > > I did read something on that the Status and Assertion have overlapping > functionality so I commented out Assertion and still the same thing. I > looked at the StatusIndicatorFSM.java file, text with history "hx" and > "history" should be annotated so I'm not sure why it's not working. > > Am I missing some config? > > Regards, > Paula > > ------------------------------ > From: pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu > > To: user@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:46:12 +0000 > > > Paula, > > If you would like to use the old status annotator for history in the > interim while the new assertion module models are added. > > One can just uncomment the below from your AggregatePlaintextPipeline > config/descriptor: > > <!-- > > <node>StatusAnnotator</node> > > --> > > That annotator will set the IdentifiedAnnotation.uncertainty() with one of > the following values: > > *HISTORY_STATUS* = 1; > > *FAMILY_HISTORY_STATUS* = 2; > > *PROBABLE_STATUS* = 3; > > > > --Pei > > > > *From:* digital paula [mailto:cybersat...@hotmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:00 AM > *To:* user@ctakes.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > > > > Hi Tim, > > I remember you, you helped me out a while back! I can't tell you how > much that BagOfAnnotations.java file has been a Godsend! Thanks again > for posting it last month. > > As for historyOf feature, I don't so much mind performance so if you > have something that works for the historyOf with just only a performance > issue, I'll still take it. I do appreciate your prompt response on the > historyOf feature which saved me from stepping through the code which I've > done a few times....the time spent stepping through is equivalent to > watching a feature film and there's a lot going on in the code that I don't > understand yet. > > As for sementID's with the rule-based sectionizer/segmenter, I'd like > to help out with testing. It appears that the first step is manual > configuration per your email. Pei, when you have a moment I'd like to > start with explanation of how it works then we can move forward from > there. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Paula > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:24:20 -0500 > From: timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu > To: user@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > > Hi Paula, > The historyOf module is currently under development, that explains those > files you're seeing. As of right now we are not satisfied enough with the > performance to release it publicly. It is marked 0 because it is defined as > an integer field I believe, so it can't be assigned null. > > As for the segment IDs in your other question, the default segmenter just > makes the whole document one segment because we don't yet have a module > robust enough to run on notes from any institution. We have been hoping to > get one developed but nothing has materialized so far. There is a > rule-based sectionizer/segmenter in the cTAKES distribution but it requires > some manual configuration and is not very widely tested. If you are > interested in helping test it out that would be great. Pei would be the > best person to explain to you how it works, we'll see if he's able to chime > in. > (Ah, I just checked and saw he already pointed you to it. If you want to > try it we can help you get it working.) > > Thanks > Tim > > On 11/25/2013 11:13 PM, digital paula wrote: > > Matt, sorry but I sent the email by accident and didn't finish my > thought. Since there's this file (historyOf.psv) in the Assertion folder > it gives the impression that Assertion can be configured to account for > historyOf. Though I tried some of the words such as "had diabetes" or > "prior diabetes" and value still 0 for historyOf feature. I think it is > configurable because of the fact the default value for historyOf is 0 as > opposed to <NULL> . Maybe I should step through the code and see where and > when it's assigning 0. > > Regards, > Paula > > ------------------------------ > > From: cybersat...@hotmail.com > To: user@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:09:33 -0500 > > Hi Matt, > > it's me again. Are you sure that historyOf feature can't be configured > using Assertion. I was looking around the Assertion folder and came > across a file called historyOf.psv. What is this? > > It contains the following: > > has been|historyOf|historyOf > > had|historyOf|historyOf > > hx of recent|historyOf|historyOf > > hx of|historyOf|historyOf > > hx|historyOf|historyOf > > recent|historyOf|historyOf > > s/p|historyOf|historyOf > > status post|historyOf|historyOf > > post|historyOf|historyOf > > previous|historyOf|historyOf > > prior|historyOf|historyOf > > > ------------------------------ > > From: mco...@mitre.org > To: user@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:50:59 +0000 > > The ctakes assertion module does not have an option to set the historyOf > attribute. The assertion module only sets subject, polarity, uncertainty, > conditional, and generic. > > > > Matt > > > > *From: *digital paula <cybersat...@hotmail.com> > *Reply-To: *"user@ctakes.apache.org" <user@ctakes.apache.org> > *Date: *Monday, 2013-11-25 15:13 > *To: *"user@ctakes.apache.org" <user@ctakes.apache.org> > *Subject: *RE: Question pertaining to HistoryOf and SegmentID features > > > > >
