I'll vote deprecate. Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2014, at 10:39 AM, "Murali Nagendranath" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 if it is not widely used. Murali On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Carrell, David <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 -David -----Original Message----- From: Savova, Guergana [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:53 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: ctakes-pad-term-spotter component? I vote to deprecate. --Guergana From: Chen, Pei [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:45 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: ctakes-pad-term-spotter component? Hi, Is anyone still using the pad-term-spotter component? Deprecating this module if it's no longer used will simplify the codebase and reduce the effort in support... --Pei ________________________________ GHC Confidentiality Statement This message and any attached files might contain confidential information protected by federal and state law. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entities originally named as addressees. The improper disclosure of such information may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. If this message reached you in error, please contact the sender and destroy this message. Disclosing, copying, forwarding, or distributing the information by unauthorized individuals or entities is strictly prohibited by law.
