#1 is definitely my favorite. However, use #3 front page graphic in the #1 website 'examples' link.
Todd Lingren Biomedical Informatics Cincinnati Children’s Hospital [email protected] 513-803-9032 -----Original Message----- From: Karthik Sarma [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 11:42 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] new cTAKES web site Thanks so much for your work on these! I like 1 and 4 best, pretty much for the same reasons as everyone else. Hope you all had a great holiday season! ᐧ -- Karthik Sarma UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program Class of 20?? Member, UCLA Medical Imaging & Informatics Lab Member, CA Delegation to the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association [email protected] gchat: [email protected] linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ksarma On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Chen, Pei <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > Michelle, Sean, Guergana, and Co. have created a few mockups for the > new cTAKES website. Which option would folks prefer? > This is purely on the design intent, and layout, etc. (not actual > content). > > Option 1: http://mwchen.scripts.mit.edu/cTakes/mock0/index.html > Option 2: http://mwchen.scripts.mit.edu/cTakes/mock1/index.html > Option 3: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ctakes/site/new/index.html > Option 4: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ctakes/site/new/index2.html > > >
