I’d like to wait on CURATOR-148 as part of larger usability pass on Curator.
-Jordan On April 21, 2015 at 11:35:59 AM, Mike Drob ([email protected]) wrote: Ack, I meant to say that I would like CURATOR-148 but don't know how compatible it is. Brain and fingers didn't agree. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: I merged CURATOR-204 (apache 16 is the latest). I’ll take a look at CURATOR-164 as well. -JZ On April 21, 2015 at 11:12:52 AM, Mike Drob ([email protected]) wrote: I'd like to see CURATOR-204. I'll check later today if there is an apache-parent-17 that we should be using instead of 16, even. Maybe we can also do CURATOR-164, I'll try to finish it up this week. CURATOR-164 would be nice, but I'm not sure how those look from a compatibility viewpoint. We should also pay attention to the ask in CURATOR-193 and make sure that we don't run into anything similar for 2.8.0. Mike On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: I think we have enough for a 2.8.0 release. Discuss now, please, if you’d like to see any other issues in the next release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12329300 -Jordan
