So does this mean I should try to modify tree cache to do multi transaction? I was wondering if this is something I can do on top of stock tree cache? if yes .. any pointers on how?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > How would you do multiple levels? Maybe I'm missing something, but don't > you need to know the names of the child nodes for a level before you can > query the level below that? > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> You could even do multiple levels. Of course, you’d run into the 1MB >> limit at some point. But, maybe if TreeCache knows it needs to do a certain >> amount of work it could batch it via multi-transaction. >> >> >> On September 15, 2015 at 6:57:36 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> [email protected]) wrote: >> >> So you could execute the all the required getChildren calls for a >> particular level of the tree in a single call to ZK? >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> However, there is an optimization opportunity by using ZK’s >>> multi-transactions. Maybe we can explore this. >>> >>> -Jordan >>> >>> >>> >>> On September 15, 2015 at 6:44:46 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >>> [email protected]) wrote: >>> >>> It would be largely dependent upon how much data you're caching. The >>> tree cache needs to recursively query ZK to populate the cache. >>> cheers >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Vikrant Singh < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> I am using tree cache for one of my project. Issue I am facing is with >>>> the time it is taking for initialize itself. It is taking around 300ms to >>>> 3-4 s to load itself. >>>> This is how I am initializing the client and cache >>>> >>>> >>>> * private val client = CuratorFrameworkFactory.newClient(hostList, new >>>> ExponentialBackoffRetry(ZookeeperCache.RetryInterval.toMillis.toInt,ZookeeperCache.RetryCount))* >>>> >>>> >>>> *val cache = TreeCache.newBuilder(client, path).build()* >>>> >>>> >>>> post this I register for a handler and then wait for >>>> "TreeCacheEvent.Type.INITIALIZED" event. It take on avg 300ms to 3-4 s. >>>> IS there something I can do to improve this performance? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Vikrant >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
