Hi Curator users,

I have a use-case where I need to create a very large number (~70,000)  of 
child nodes under a parent. These nodes themselves contain no data and will 
only have a handful of child nodes themselves.

e.g.

/someparentNode/LotsOfChildNodesHere-1/ACoupleofNodesAtThisLevel

/someparentNode/LotsOfChildNodesHere-2/ACoupleofNodesAtThisLevel

...

/someparentNode/LotsOfChildNodesHere-70000/ACoupleofNodesAtThisLevel



I've read (https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.8/zookeeperAdmin.html) there 
is a limit of 1 MB. But I hit the limit for the getChildren operation around 4 
MB. I'm interested in what's causing the difference in the limit.



To give more detail I have a primary and secondary use-case:

My primary use-case includes having watchers on the children of 
"/someparentNode" and requesting getChildren for 
"/someparentNode/LotsOfChildNodesHere-N" (which only has a couple child nodes).

My secondary use-case would be requesting the children of "/someparentNode", 
which would be only occasionally for reporting purposes (which has a lot of 
child nodes and probably won't be as much as 70k nodes, but I hit the limit 
there).



I'm looking for answers for the following questions:

What are the stability issues that you think might occur having lots of nodes 
under one node, even if we read them rarely?

Can I reliable use the "jute.maxbuffer" system property on the client in the 
future?

Looking for answers whether the asymmetry of the default value on client side 
and on server side is accidental or intentional.



Any advice is much appreciated.


Thanks,

Zoltan Szekeres


________________________________

NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or 
views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice 
within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in error, 
please destroy all electronic and paper copies; do not disclose, use or act 
upon the information; and notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not 
intended to waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the 
right, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic 
communications. This message is subject to terms available at the following 
link: http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers If you cannot access these 
links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. 
By messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.

Reply via email to