Got the root cause, these 2 tables are on hdfs, there are some network
stability issues between the drill server and namenode these days.
Thanks guys for your support, really appreciate it.

Thanks,
Wen

On 9/10/15, 11:04 AM, "Jinfeng Ni" <[email protected]> wrote:

>FirstStart/LastStart indicates the query planning time. That
>indicates planner takes ~53 seconds to get the plan.
>
>Is rpp_event_group or rpp_event a view or base table? The query
>you posted just contain a two table join. Seems 53s is too long
>to plan for such a query, unless either 'rpp_event_group' or 'rpp_event'
>is a view which contains join as well.
>
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Liu, Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Here it is,
>> select a.url_txt as url, a.rpp_event_grp_id as grpid from
>> dfs.tdhdp.`rpp_event_group` as a, dfs.tdhdp.`rpp_event` as b where
>> a.site_id = 0 and b.active_ind = 1 and a.rpp_event_grp_id =
>> b.rpp_event_grp_id group by a.url_txt, a.rpp_event_grp_id
>>
>>
>> Below is the tdhdp definition:
>> "tdhdp": {
>>       "location": "/user/tdhdp/latest",
>>       "writable": true,
>>       "defaultInputFormat": "parquet"
>>     }
>>
>> Let me know if anything else needed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wen
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/15, 10:31 AM, "Hsuan Yi Chu" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Can you share your query ? What does it look like ?
>> >
>> >On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Liu, Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi there,
>> >> I am running drillbit in localhost, and the zookeeper is also on the
>> >>same
>> >> host. I sent the same query multiple times, most of them response
>>very
>> >> quickly(<500ms). But a few are slowly. On query profile page, I saw
>>the
>> >> slow queries have a long time for "First Start" column, see below
>> >>sample.
>> >> Any hints what's the possible reason?
>> >>
>> >> I tried both 0.8.0 and 1.1.0, and got the same result.
>> >>
>> >> Major Fragment  Minor Fragments Reporting       First Start     Last
>> >> Start      First End       Last End        tmin    tavg    tmax
>> >>memmax
>> >> 00-xx-xx        1 / 1   53.668  53.668  53.877  53.877  0.209   0.209
>> >>  0.209   27MB
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Wen
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to