I don't understand why they wouldn't be allowed. They seem perfectly valid.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <[email protected]> wrote: > I have the following table tpch100/lineitem that contains 97 parquet files: > > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-00000.parquet > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-00001.parquet > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-00002.parquet > > ... > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-00096.parquet > > I can run the following queries: > > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `tpch100/lineit*; > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `tpch100/lineitem/part-m-0001*'; > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `tpch100/lineitem/*'; > > The third query will fail if the table has metadata (it has to do with the > .drill.parquet_metadata showing up at the top of the file system results) > > My question is: should the 2nd and 3rd queries be allowed, if we are > querying a table folder that doesn't contain any sub folders ? > > -- > > Abdelhakim Deneche > > Software Engineer > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > < > http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available > > >
