In the view or in the query? On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you try to convert src_date to a date type? > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:28 AM, John Omernik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am running 6 drill bits, they were running with 20GB of Direct Memory > and > > 4 GB of Heap, and I altered them to run with 18GB of direct and 6 GB of > > Heap, and I am still getting this error. > > > > I am running a query, and trying to understand why so much heap space is > > being used. The data is Parquet files, organized into directories by date > > (2015-01-01, 2015-01-02 etc) > > > > TABLE > > ---> 2015-01-01 > > ---> 2015-01-02 > > > > Etc > > > > This data isn't what I would call "huge", at most 500 MB per day, with 69 > > parquet files per day. While I do have the planning issue related to > lots > > of directories with lots of files, (see other emails) I don't think that > is > > related here. > > > > I have a view that basically select dir0 as src_date, field1, field2, > > field3 from table, then I run a query such as > > > > select src_date, count(1) from view_table where src_date >= '2016-02-25' > > group by src_date > > > > That will work. > > > > If I run > > > > select src_date, count(1) from view_table where src_date >= '2016-02-01' > > group by src_date > > > > That will hang, and eventually I will see drillbit crash and restart and > > the errors logs point to Java Heap Space issues. This is the same on 4 > GB > > or 6 GB HEAP Space. > > > > So my question is this... > > > > Given the data, how do I troubleshoot this and provide helpful feedback? > I > > am running the MapR 1.4 Developer Release right now, this to me seems to > be > > an issue in that why would a single query be able to crash a node? > > SHouldn't the query be terminated? Even so, why would 30 days of 500mb of > > data (i.e. it would take 15 GB of direct ram per node, which is > available, > > to load the ENTIRE DATA set into ram) crash given that sort of > aggregation? > > >
