Can you try this: select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from dfs.asa.`/transactions` group by sold_to having count(*) > 70;
This is because column alias in the SELECT clause could not be used in WHERE clause, GroupBy, or Having clause [1] In your original query, the "trans_count" in where/having clause is resolved to a regular column whose name is "trans_count" in the table. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2068682/why-cant-i-use-alias-in-a-count-column-and-reference-it-in-a-having-clause On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Stefán Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > Having fails as well > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Bob Rumsby <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Without trying it or seeing your tables/files, I would expect this to work: >> >> select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from dfs.asa.`/transactions` >> group by sold_to >> having trans_count > 70; >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Stefán Baxter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Having adds to the trouble and claims that the field needs to be grouped >> > and then fails the same way if it's added to group by. >> > >> > I ended up wrapping this in a "with <> as ()" but that is far from ideal. >> > >> > Regards, >> > -Stefán >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Bob Rumsby <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Try using the HAVING clause. The WHERE clause cannot constrain the >> > results >> > > of aggregate functions. >> > > http://drill.apache.org/docs/having-clause/ >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Stefán Baxter < >> > [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > I'm using parquet+drill and the following statement works just fine: >> > > > >> > > > select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from >> > > > dfs.asa.`/processed/venuepoint/transactions` where group by sold_to; >> > > > >> > > > When addin this where clause nothing is returned: >> > > > >> > > > select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from dfs.asa.`/transactions` >> > > where >> > > > trans_count > 70 group by sold_to; >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Is this a known limitation or a bug? >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > -Stefán >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
