John Cool. Please share back your findings on this list. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, John Omernik <[email protected]> wrote:
> LOL Sorry folks, yes, I meant this for the Apache Zeppelin list. Thanks > Magnus for the response, I will also send over to the Zeppelin list. > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Magnus Pierre <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello John, > > I assume you are talking about Zeppelin -> Drill? I’ve think I’ve seen it > > done. Let me check with the person I believe did what you ask for and ask > > how he did it. I think it is somewhat convenient to have one and the same > > ”tag” for all statements that goes against jdbc and just switch between > > source jdbc using config but I am sure there’s cases where this is not > the > > case. > > > > > > Regards, > > Magnus > > > > > > > > > > > 11 apr 2016 kl. 15:02 skrev John Omernik <[email protected]>: > > > > > > So I copied the %jdbc interpreter. I am looking to create a specific > > > connection to Apache Drill, and would like to use the jdbc interpreter, > > but > > > invoke it by calling %drill rather than %jdbc, is this possible? I > tried > > > create interpreter and did a new name "drill" with interpreter type > jdbc, > > > but I just got a new interpreter drill that could be invoked by %jdbc > > (This > > > seemed backwards to me) Is it possible to do what I am trying to do? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > John > > > > >
