nevermind , I changed to jdbc:drill:drillbit=node1;schema=hbase and its work now.
2016-08-02 20:04 GMT+08:00 qiang li <[email protected]>: > Sorry , I follow the doc use the url : > > jdbc:drill:drillbit=node1/drill/drillbits2;schema=hbase > > It's throw java.nio.channels.UnresolvedAddressException. But the host > name is configured in the hosts file. > > Did I miss something? > > Thanks > > 2016-08-02 17:45 GMT+08:00 qiang li <[email protected]>: > >> Great, that's what I need. I missed the detail in the doc. >> >> Thanks >> >> 2016-08-02 0:01 GMT+08:00 Dechang Gu <[email protected]>: >> >>> You may try to connect to a different drillbit in, say, a round-robin >>> fashion, for the >>> queries. See reference: >>> >>> https://drill.apache.org/docs/using-the-jdbc-driver/#using-the-jdbc-url-format-for-a-direct-drillbit-connection >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:27 AM, qiang li <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > We are running query concurrently and get connection through jdbc. >>> > >>> > We found that the querys are not distributed equally in the cluster. >>> That >>> > is some nodes have more querys while others are less. >>> > >>> > This will cause query running slow at the busy node. >>> > >>> > Does there have any way to let the query disributed well? >>> > For example, I have a cluster with 16 nodes. If I running 16 querys >>> > concurrently, the ideal result is each node have one query running. >>> > >>> >> >> >
