Hi John,

All good points!

How comfortable are you with Java? The current REST API evolved organically 
based on the needs of the web UI. While we could wait for a REST re-design, we 
could also move forward just adding the messages you need — especially if you 
can contribute the code.

The code is in org.apache.drill.exec.server.rest.LogInLogOutResources. This is 
a mercifully short file. The login page message itself is one line of actual 
code:

  @POST
  @Path("/login")
  @Produces(MediaType.TEXT_HTML)
  public Viewable getLoginPageAfterValidationError() {
    return ViewableWithPermissions.createLoginPage("Invalid username/password 
credentials.");
  }

Seems simple enough to change above method to add the HTTP status to the 
generated web page; the browser won’t care.

The web framework Drill uses is quite rich (mucked about with it a year ago, 
but have gotten rusty since.) There is an easy way to indicate the HTTP status; 
I just can’t remember what it is…

Anyone else remember how to set the return status in a Jetty response?

Thanks,

- Paul


> On Jul 7, 2017, at 5:48 AM, John Omernik <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello all, I recently setup some notebooks using the Rest API.
> 
> I found that I was using Drill 1.8, and my code for determining
> authentication in Python, while hacky, worked...  What I found is using
> python requests, when I posted to j_security check, the requests object
> almost always returned a HTTP 200.
> 
> If it was a bad username/password, I parsed the page and looked for that
> text.  In 1.8, if login was successful the string "Number of Drill Bits"
> appeared on in the response text. From the requests module perspective,
> both used HTTP 200 as a status code.  However, on a successful login, Drill
> actually sends a HTTP 303 that goes to / and apparently requests auto grabs
> that request like nothing happened. Never telling me, the programmer about
> the 303.
> 
> However, in Drill 1.10, the UI for the / page improved, and likely, the
> string "Number of Drill Bits" was removed.  This made it so I now had to
> reprogram my auth code to handle it better.
> 
> So here I am, What IS the best way to determine programmatically in a way
> that will remain stable if login was successful. Obviously string parsing
> is prone to error and can be changed.  I tried checking for the presence of
> a JSESSIONID but that can show up either way.
> 
> So what is the "right" way to indicate login is successful? Could we do
> something better with response codes? I know having the Form seems to make
> sense, but could we just use basic authentication and set the header with
> the form? That way, we could issue single queries with basic auth and get a
> Unauthorized if the authentication didn't work.  I don't know if I have an
> answer, but I do know that working with the Rest API isn't all that
> intuitive, it should be easier to tell if login was successful...  I am
> interested in the thoughts of others here.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (Code)
>    def authDrill(self):
>        url = self.drill_base_url + "/j_security_check"
>        login = {'j_username': self.drill_user, 'j_password':
> self.drill_pass}
> 
>        verify = "/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt"
> 
>        if self.drill_pin_to_ip == True:
>            verify = False
> 
> requests.packages.urllib3.disable_warnings(InsecureRequestWarning)
>        else:
>            verify = "/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt"
> 
>        r = self.session.post(url, data=login, headers=self.drill_headers,
> verify=verify)
>        if r.status_code == 200:
>            if r.text.find("Invalid username/password credentials") >= 0:
>                raise Exception("Invalid username/password credentials")
>            elif r.text.find("Number of Drill Bits") >= 0:
>                pass
>            else:
>                raise Exception("Unknown HTTP 200 Code: %s" % r.text)
>        else:
>            raise Exception("Status Code: %s - Error" % r.status_code)
>        return self.session

Reply via email to