On 1/5/06, Usha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using the native rule definition method, how do I define the conditions > such > that they are organized as in Scenario 1? So, in the above example, if > Condition1 in Rule 1 does not pass, Rule 2 should not be even tested, but > Rule > 3 should be tested. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. >
Sounds like you're talking about condition sharing, although I don't know anything about the native method, so I can't help with your underlying question. Just clarifying terminology. -- Geoffrey Wiseman
