If you can give me some pointers, I'll see if I can get to grips with the code and see if I (or the company I work for) can contribute something (be it time, money ;-))
2006/2/7, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Will consider it for Drools 3 - some kind of an "else" criteria. > > On 2/7/06, Ronald van Kuijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2006/2/7, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I am pretty sure it is, within the bounds of what is already there. > > > > > > You kind of suggested one way yourself. On each rule row, have an > extra > > > action (which you can hide if you like) that changes a value to stop > the > > > "default" from firing. > > > > > > Aren't I great ;-) > > > > > > From the sounds of it, you are imagining a switch statement, which means > > you > > > are looking at top to bottom operation. If you only want one rule to > > fire, > > > and then the rules to stop processing, you can achieve all this by > > simply > > > having a rule with no conditions applying (not sure if that is what > you > > > want). > > > > > > Yes, top to bottom, but the last rule should only fire if none of the > > previous ones fired.... > > > > Initially I'll go for the first option, but to me it sounds like a nice > > enhancement > > > > Tia... > > > > > >
