I have no clues about that unfortunately, it does sound wierd. What would
cause a jar to be locked? Its almost as if tomcat hasn't finished
classloading or something.

On 3/10/06, Kristofer Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes, the problem is exactly that. The core drools jar files (and only
> those)
> are beeing held by tomcat (locked) when the application restarts which
> prevents them from being deleted.
>
> Thx
>
> Kristofer
>
>
> On 3/10/06, Michael Neale < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > so the problem is with the jar files? (locked?)
> >
> > On 3/10/06, Kristofer Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > i am having problems using drools together with tomcat ( 5.0). This is
> > what
> > > happens: When I deploy an application with drools using the java,
> groovy
> > > or
> > > python semantics, the tomcat server and the application starts up
> > without
> > > problems. But when I make a hot deploy on the application, the tomcat
> > > server
> > > seems to keep a lock on the core drools jar files preventing them from
> > > being
> > > deleted, and therefore making it impossible to redeploy.
> > >
> > > When using only the native (java) way of defining rules and rulebases,
> > > everything works fine. I did read in jira and this mailing list
> archive
> > > about some classloader issues on appservers that was solved, but no
> > > mentioning of tomcat.
> > >
> > > This problem occurs with both drools 2.1 and 2.5, just tried the
> latter
> > > one
> > > today.
> > >
> > > We are using tomcat 5.0.28 (upgrade not possble at the moment). I am
> > > personally no big fan of hot deploy but it is heavily used in the
> > > development phase in a quite large project so it sort of has to work.
> > >
> > > The questions if of course if anyone experienced the same, am I doing
> > > something stupid, does drools have to be loaded outside the
> applications
> >
> > > classloader, or is it actually something of a problem with Drools? Is
> > > there
> > > maybe a workaround? Many questions that is!
> > >
> > > Any information is appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Kristofer Eriksson
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to