No, I tried this but xml validation fails because the schema has an
enumeration for all the known semaphores. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Proctor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2006 10:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [drools-user] Subclassing Semaphores

Semaphore is just an interface, so should be possible. Look at the
various semaphores in drools-base.

Mark
Matias Otero wrote:
> If there a way to subclass a semaphore in Drools so that all the 
> characteristics of semaphores are kept in tact (i.e. passed around by 
> name rather than type) and you can also add your own domain specific 
> information?
>
>   

Reply via email to