For efficiency reasons, multiple rules with the alternative conditions are better (not NOT convenient in drools 2 !). Just something to consider.
On 3/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Warren: > > I have this condition working in Drools 2.5........ Does this help? > > <java:condition> thatObject != null || thatObject.someMethod() == > false</java:condition> > > Russ > > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren Hong > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 12:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [drools-user] Drools Conditions > > > > > so Drools 2 doesn't or , not, etc., so how can we define or condition. > For > example, if (i==1 || i==2). By the way, when Drools 3 will be > released? > > thanks! > > > >
