yes that should be fine. Calls to newWorkingMemory should be idempotent on the RuleBase object.
On 4/8/06, Yuesong Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Multiple threads use the same instance of RuleBase, > each creating a new WorkingMemory and asserting their > own facts. Would that work? > > Thanks, > > Yuesong > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
