On 4/10/06, Dmitry Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the timeframe for 3.1? Else/else if are very important to what > we're trying to do. > > I can see how I can to the following with the method described by > Geoffrey: > > if (A) then B else if (C) then D endif > > I also want to be able to do the following: > > if (A) then B else D endif > > I imagine that the rule would have to be written as a combo of > > if (A) then B endif > if (!A) then D endif > > so that the conditions are complimentary... >
Indeed, yes, that's how you'd handle it. If it does make it into 3.1, that's a good thing in terms of supporting the way people think, talk, and work in other languages, but fundamentally, the same capabilities are there now -- they just require more typing. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman
