I think the general confusion is around the www.drools.org stuff, and the new jboss rules stuff. Perhaps we need to put a big link on the drools.orgstuff to the drools 3 documentation, and make it clear that the drools.org documentation is for 2.x?
On 4/14/06, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dmitry, > > No idea what you are talking about All Drools 3.0 integration tests and > examples are in the new drl format. Having the old format would be > pointless, we can't even parse it. > > > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-examples/src/rules/ > > Mark > Dmitry Goldenberg wrote: > > It would be great if Drools would come with its example DRL files > written in the new lingo rather than the old.... > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Mark Proctor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thu 4/13/2006 4:28 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [drools-user] The DRL notation vs. jbossrules Rule Language > - ? > > > > > > > > As per my email the other day if you were to write an XSLT here is > > what it would do > > > > <parameter identifer="person"> > > <class>Person</class> > > </parameter> > > > > <java:condition>person.getName().equals("tom")</java:condition> > > ---------------- > > person : Person() > > eval( person.getName().equals("tom") ) > > ---------------- > > > > However that is no longer optimal in Drools 3.0 and should be > > Person( name == "tom" ) > > > > If you need to bind then its > > p : Person( name == "tom" ) > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > Ronald van Kuijk wrote: > > > >> AINAE, but it could be as simple as 'replacing' condition with when and > >> consequence with then, but I'll let the experts tell me. > >> > >> Ronald > >> > >> 2006/4/13, Dmitry Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >>> I don't understand the relationship between the XML-based DRL notation > and > >>> this new lingo with "when" / "then". > >>> > >>> With the DRL notation, my understanding is that you write an XML > structure > >>> like the one I'm including below. How does this change with the > when/then > >>> notation? Thanks. > >>> > >>> > >>> <?xml version="1.0"?> > >>> > >>> <rule-set name="SamplePolicyRuleSet" > >>> > >>> xmlns="http://drools.org/rules"; > >>> > >>> xmlns:java="http://drools.org/semantics/java"; > >>> > >>> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > >>> > >>> xs:schemaLocation="http://drools.org/rules rules.xsd > >>> http://drools.org/semantics/java java.xsd"> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-- Imports --> > >>> > >>> <java:import>java.lang.Object</java:import> > >>> > >>> <java:import>java.lang.String</java:import> > >>> > >>> <!-- Utility functions --> > >>> > >>> <java:functions> > >>> > >>> public boolean f1( > com.weblayers.platform.rule.PolicyExecContextcontext) > >>> > >>> { > >>> > >>> return ...; > >>> > >>> } > >>> > >>> public boolean f2( > com.weblayers.platform.rule.PolicyExecContextcontext) > >>> > >>> { > >>> > >>> return ...; > >>> > >>> } > >>> > >>> </java:functions> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-First Rule: IF (P1 AND P2) THEN RETURN OK --> > >>> > >>> <rule name="First Rule"> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule parameters --> > >>> > >>> <parameter identifier="context"> > >>> > >>> <class>MyContext</class> > >>> > >>> </parameter> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule Conditions --> > >>> > >>> <java:condition> > >>> > >>> f1() && f2() > >>> > >>> </java:condition> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule Consequences --> > >>> > >>> <java:consequence> > >>> > >>> context.setReturn(Constants.OK); > >>> > >>> </java:consequence> > >>> > >>> </rule> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-Second Rule: IF (!(P1 AND P2)) THEN RETURN FAILURE --> > >>> > >>> <rule name="Second Rule"> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule parameters --> > >>> > >>> <parameter identifier="context"> > >>> > >>> <class>MyContext</class> > >>> > >>> </parameter> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule Conditions --> > >>> > >>> <java:condition> > >>> > >>> !(f1() && f2()) > >>> > >>> </java:condition> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> <!-- Rule Consequences --> > >>> > >>> <java:consequence> > >>> > >>> context.setVerdict(Constants.FAIL); > >>> > >>> </java:consequence> > >>> > >>> </rule> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> </rule-set> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
