not yet no... but within the consequences, and functions, would be nice. Unfortunately it is non trivial to do, even with eclipse, but it can still happen. We really want to (optionally) treat the RHS as a chunk of java code. We may be able to do this sooner though as we do know the line number (the offset to the rule), but it will not be as thorough as the JDT.
I guess if the code in the RHS is that complicated, I would want to move it out into regular classes and so on... as its moving away from rules and toward code. For better or worse, people see drools as a way to do java code dynamically, but thats not really the whole story ! I have been there, and I know how much easier it is to make changes when stuff is embedded in a rule, but its dangerous and powerful. On 4/20/06, Ho, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would it be possible to have break points in DRL files ? I'm particularly > interested in having break points within the consequence section of the > code. > > One of the great things about having rules in Java is the ability to use > breakpoints, the debugger, etc. > > Regards, > Alan Ho > >
