Hi Michael,
I think I found a work around. All I had to do is include the "fact"
menuNavItem in the "eval" in some manner. I included the "&& menuNavItem !=
null" which I know must always be true and it works. I had this problem on all
the rules I had an "eval" but didn't have the "fact" referenced.
Thanks for your help
George
rule "Menu Dependents Not Elig"
when
menuNavItem : MenuNavItem( id == NavConstants.NAV_DEPENDENTS )
// Can't have Dependents without HW Plans.
// Bug must reference menuNavItem in eval for it to work.
eval( !navService.haveHWPlans() && menuNavItem != null )
then
System.out.println( "Menu Dependents Not Elig:
"+menuNavItem.getId() );
retract( menuNavItem );
end
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [drools-user] Rule Compilation error
Hi George.
Is it possible to have the MenuNavItem and other objects so we can reproduce
this?
I do know there was a bug in RC2 to do with evals, not sure if it is fixed
but I would like to confirm this, or fix and add it as a test.
On 5/2/06, Gerolimos George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone help me with this? The rule doesn't have any commas. It calls
> a "global" objects (navService) boolean methods. If the "eval" is commented
> out it works. I've used the global object in other more complicated rules
> and it works fine.
>
> rule "Menu Dependents Not Elig"
> when
> menuNavItem : MenuNavItem( id ==
> NavConstants.NAV_DEPENDENTS )
> // Can't have Dependents without HW Plans.
> eval( !navService.haveHWPlans() )
> then
> System.out.println( "Menu Dependents Not Elig:
> "+menuNavItem.getId() );
> retract( menuNavItem );
> end
> .
>
> org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: Rule Compilation error Syntax error on
> token ",", delete this token
>
> at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:378)
> at org.drools.reteoo.RuleBaseImpl.addPackage(RuleBaseImpl.java
> :303)
> at org.drools.jsr94.rules.admin.RuleExecutionSetImpl.<init>(
> RuleExecutionSetImpl.java:117)
> at
> org.drools.jsr94.rules.admin.LocalRuleExecutionSetProviderImpl.createRuleExecutionSet
> (LocalRuleExecutionSetProviderImpl.java:183)
> at
> org.drools.jsr94.rules.admin.LocalRuleExecutionSetProviderImpl.createRuleExecutionSet
> (LocalRuleExecutionSetProviderImpl.java:127)
> at com.mhris.common.rules.RuleEngineFacade.addRuleExecutionSet(
> RuleEngineFacade.java:50)
> at
> com.mhris.benefits.navigation.StatelessRuleSessionTestCase.setUp(
> StatelessRuleSessionTestCase.java:61)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
> (RemoteTestRunner.java:481)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:347)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
>
>
> Thanks
> George
>
> The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is
> intended solely for the use of the named addressee.
> Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained
> therein by any other person is not authorized.
> If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by
> returning the e-mail to the originator.(16b)
>
>
The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended
solely for the use of the named addressee.
Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by
any other person is not authorized.
If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning
the e-mail to the originator.(16b)
