Hi Michael,

thank you for the reply. Is the a roude map for the release of RC3 or can I get 
it from an cvs repository?

christian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Michael Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 13:16
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [drools-user] Problems with Array-Parameter in functions

The first one is a bug, that is fixed in RC3 when it comes out.

The second one is wrong, as the function needs to return a boolean for it to
make sense in an eval.


Michael.

On 5/8/06, Kihm, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> we plan to migrate our rule-base vom drools 2.5 to jbossrules. But we
> have many Problems to get it run. If there is for example a function
> with an array parameter like this:
>
>
>
> function void yourFunction(String[] args) {
>
>       /* code goes here*/
>
> }
>
>
>
> Then the excecution ends with following error:
>
>
>
> org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: unknown:5:45 Unexpected token '['
>
> unknown:5:45 Unexpected token '['
>
>
>
>       at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:378)
>
>       at
> org.drools.reteoo.RuleBaseImpl.addPackage(RuleBaseImpl.java:303)
>
>       at com.sample.DroolsTest.readRule(DroolsTest.java:77)
>
>       at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:23)
>
>
>
>
>
> For tests we have to some boxing/outboxing with the array parameter like
> this:
>
>
>
> function void yourFunction (List argsM){
>
>       String[] args = (String[])argsM.toArray(new String[argsM.size()]);
>
> /* code goes here*/
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> rule "argTest"
>
>
>
>       salience 11
>
>       no-loop true
>
>
>
>       when
>
>             eval( yourFunction(Arrays.asList(new String[] {"1", "2",
> "6"})) )
>
>       then
>
>             System.out.println("it works");
>
>
>
> End
>
>
>
> Butt his ends with following error:
>
>
>
> org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: Rule Compilation error The method
> yourFunction(List) is undefined for the type argTest
>
>
>
> Can anyone please give me a hint why this going wrong?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Christian
>
>
>

Reply via email to