Re: [drools-user] Using my own Extractor Factory?

[Mark Proctor]

a. is  easy not difficult to solve b. this is extremely none trivial. However we are going to offer a compromise where we allow standard field  constraints syntax, but internally its switched to a predicate. Mark Trevor Pocock wrote: You cant yet do anything like:Bar(foo.tuo == "...") but you can doBar($foo: foo) eval($foo.getTuo().equals("...")) I think its a seperate problem. Hmmm I think our problems might be at least related. If i understand it right, the reasons you cant do something like Bar(foo.tuo == "...") is because a. the extracter mechanism needs to build a path from a Bar to its Foo and then extract the string from the Foo b. the rule engine needs to know which rules need to be checked when any object in a path is modified, i.e. when the Bar changes its foo or when the foo changes its tuo string or have i missed something? T --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email -- This email has been verified as Virus free Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net