no, that would not be a rule then, that would be procedural code.
But you can achieve what you want in a better loose coupled way. Basically, you have 2 rules: rule1: when Something(....) then assert(new ControlFact()); rule2: when Something() c: ControlFact() then ... do it here... retract(c); This assumes there is only one Something() in working memory, if not, you will need to either repeat the conditions in the second rule, OR, wrap Something() inside the "control fact" object which the second rule responds to. The "ControlFact" is a little object you create and name appropriately to express your intent. This is a better design as there could in future be more rules that can "fire" the second rule in effect, so there is no tight coupling. On 1/3/07, Nirmal.R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Can i do the following > execute a particular (2nd)rule directly when an Object satisfies the 1st rule, is it possible? > If possible can pass the object from 1st rule to 2nd rule directly thank you Nirmal -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Executing-rules-from-another-rule-tf2912939.html#a8139134 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
