Hi Hawin! The benchmark you refer to is a more or less pure SQL benchmark.
For systems that are designed for exactly the "beyond SQL" applications (streaming, iterative algorithms, UDFs, ...), this benchmark is probably not very meaningful, as it covers not one of these areas. Even in the SQL analytics space, this is not a very representative benchmark. The TPC benchmarks are probably more interesting there. They are designed with more input from industry and go through more design cycles. Greetings, Stephan On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Hawin Jiang <hawin.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Slim and Fabian > > Here is the Spark benchmark. https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/benchmark/ > Do we have s similar report or comparison like that. > Thanks. > > > > Best regards > Hawin > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Slim Baltagi <sbalt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Fabian >> >> > I could not find which versions of Flink and Spark were compared. >> According to Norman Spangenberg, one of the authors of the conference >> paper, >> the benchmark used *Spark* version was *1.2.0*. and *Flink* version was >> *0.8.0*. >> >> I did ask him a few more questions about the benchmark between Flink and >> Spark. >> I'll share the answers once Norman Spangenberg gets back to me. >> >> Thanks >> >> Slim Baltagi >> Apache Flink Knowledge Base ( Now with over 300 categorized web >> resources!) >> http://sparkbigdata.com/component/tags/tag/27-flink >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Benchmark-results-between-Flink-and-Spark-tp1940p1957.html >> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list >> archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
