Hi Cory! "flink-core" and "flink-annotations" should not have Scala suffixes, because they do not depend on Scala.
So far, we mark the Scala independent projects without suffixes. Is that very confusing, or does that interfere with build tools? Greetings, Stephan On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Cory Monty <cory.mo...@getbraintree.com> wrote: > As of this afternoon, SBT is running into issues compiling with the > following error: > > [error] Modules were resolved with conflicting cross-version suffixes in > [error] org.scalatest:scalatest _2.10, _2.11 > [error] org.apache.flink:flink-core _2.11, <none> > [error] org.apache.flink:flink-annotations _2.11, <none> > java.lang.RuntimeException: Conflicting cross-version suffixes in: > org.scalatest:scalatest, org.apache.flink:flink-core, > org.apache.flink:flink-annotations > at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27) > at sbt.ConflictWarning$.processCrossVersioned(ConflictWarning.scala:46) > at sbt.ConflictWarning$.apply(ConflictWarning.scala:32) > at sbt.Classpaths$$anonfun$66.apply(Defaults.scala:1164) > at sbt.Classpaths$$anonfun$66.apply(Defaults.scala:1161) > at scala.Function1$$anonfun$compose$1.apply(Function1.scala:47) > at sbt.$tilde$greater$$anonfun$$u2219$1.apply(TypeFunctions.scala:40) > at sbt.std.Transform$$anon$4.work(System.scala:63) > at sbt.Execute$$anonfun$submit$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(Execute.scala:226) > at sbt.Execute$$anonfun$submit$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(Execute.scala:226) > at sbt.ErrorHandling$.wideConvert(ErrorHandling.scala:17) > at sbt.Execute.work(Execute.scala:235) > at sbt.Execute$$anonfun$submit$1.apply(Execute.scala:226) > at sbt.Execute$$anonfun$submit$1.apply(Execute.scala:226) > at > sbt.ConcurrentRestrictions$$anon$4$$anonfun$1.apply(ConcurrentRestrictions.scala:159) > at sbt.CompletionService$$anon$2.call(CompletionService.scala:28) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > Any thoughts are greatly appreciated! > > Cheers, > > Cory >
