Thanks for the suggestion Vishnu! Stackoverflow documentation looks great. I like the easy contribution and versioning features.
However, I am a bit skeptical. IMO, Flink's primary documentation must be hosted by Apache. Out-sourcing such an important aspect of a project to an external service is not an option for me. This would mean, that documentation on SO would be an additional / secondary documentation. I see two potential problems with that: - It is duplicate effort to keep two documentations up-to-date. Adding a new feature of changing some behavior must be documented in two places. - Efforts to improve documentation might split up, i.e., the primary documentation might receive less improvements and contributions. Of course, this is just my opinion but I think it is worth to mention these points. Thanks, Fabian 2016-09-05 12:22 GMT+02:00 Ravikumar Hawaldar <ravikumar.hawal...@gmail.com> : > Hi, > > > I just committed to apache-flink documentation on SO, one more commit > required. Nice idea to document on SO Vishnu. > > > > Regards, > > Ravikumar > > On 5 September 2016 at 14:22, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> This looks neat. Let's try it out. I just voted. >> >> Cheers, >> Max >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Vishnu Viswanath >> <vishnu.viswanat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Why don't we make use of Stackoverflow's new documentation feature to do >> > some documentation of Apache Flink. >> > >> > To start, at least 5 SO users should commit to document, who has at >> least150 >> > reputation and have at least 1 positively scored answer in Flink tag. >> > >> > http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/apache-flink >> > >> > Regards, >> > Vishnu Viswanath >> > >
